|
Senior adults, while the leading
consumers of prescription and OTC medications, often present with confusion,
frustration, and economic difficulties relating to the procurement of their
medication. The use of generic drugs has been a source of cost savings for
both the patient and the provider. However, it is also a source of potentially
inappropriate medication selection for seniors when a newer, brand
pharmaceutical agent that is more pharmacokinetic appropriate for a geriatric
patient is passed over in favor of a low-cost generic. Frequently, a switch
from brand to generic may be across therapeutic classes and not within the
same class. In fact, suboptimal medication selection is fairly common and has
been associated with worse patient-reported health-related quality of life.
1 Some brand pharmaceutical products facilitate the use of two or more
active ingredients through a combination product dosage. Others are
long-acting or extended-release dosage forms that provide 24-hour coverage,
thereby reducing the number of administrations required per day. These
conveniences come at a price. In fact, some are so prohibitive in cost that
they actually hinder the effort to improve compliance, as seniors often split
tablets and take only half doses, skip doses, or avoid using their medication
because of its cost.2
One population-based survey of
Americans age 70 and older aimed to determine which elderly patients are at
the highest risk of restricting their medications because of cost and how
prescription coverage modifies this risk.2 The study identified
risk factors for medication restriction in subjects who lacked prescription
coverage and found that the strongest independent predictors of medication
restriction were minority ethnicity, annual income less than $10,000, and
out-of-pocket prescription drug costs greater than $100 per month.2
Researchers concluded that medication restriction is common in seniors who
lack prescription coverage. Seniors in the same high-risk groups who have
prescription coverage are much less likely to restrict their medication usage.
2
Confusion, mistakes, and potentially
harmful circumstances abound when a combination product is prescribed for a
senior patient who is not aware it contains the same ingredient as the OTC
product just purchased in the supermarket. Pharmacists can attest to the
occurrence of dangerous duplicative therapy as a result of seniors being
unfamiliar with the generic names of the active ingredients in the drugs that
they receive. By educating seniors on both the brand and generic names of
their medications (in verbal and written form) and alerting them to the
potential dangers involved in confusing these names, therapy duplication may
be avoided. This also concerns traveling seniors, as most drugs abroad are
sold under different trade names yet contain the same active ingredients as a
commonly used medication in the United States. Ideally, for safety, each
medication should be labeled with the brand and generic names.
Generics and Provider
Cost-Reduction Strategies
Many employer health plans and government payer plans have adopted
incentive-based formularies to control prescription-drug costs.3
Elderly Medicare beneficiaries can lower out-of-pocket spending and increase
their options for low-cost Medicare Part D plans by using generic drugs.4
However, many seniors become confused over the difference between a generic
and a brand and whether they should accept a generic when it is substituted
for a brand. Pharmacists can intervene by guiding seniors with their choices
based on clinical, administrative, and economic circumstances. Assistance by a
pharmacist with expertise in medication selection is a valuable service to
seniors when choosing an appropriate pharmacy benefit plan, including a
Medicare Part D plan, based on their current needs and potential issues
related to comorbidities.
The importance of this concept is
illustrated by the fact that various changes in the administration of a
formulary may have dramatically different effects on utilization and spending
and may lead plan enrollees to discontinue therapy in some cases.3
Changes in copayments can substantially alter out-of-pocket spending by plan
members, the continuation of medication use, and the quality of care.3
A large proportion of patients in
the U.S. are enrolled in three-tier pharmacy benefit plans. Tiered
prescription copayments have been associated with a significant shift from
nonpreferred to preferred brand medications.5 This concept
constitutes a financial incentive, to help purchasers that provide open-access
drug benefits, by guiding the use of medications toward lower-cost brands.
5 It has been suggested that further investigation is required to
determine the clinical effects of changes in medication use brought about by
differential copayments.5
Older patients of general
practitioners and, to a greater extent, cardiologists, are often prescribed
brand name drugs when generic equivalents are available (e.g., beta-blockers,
thiazides, calcium channel blockers [CCBs], angiotensin-converting enzyme
[ACE] inhibitors, and alpha-1–adrenergic receptor antagonists).4
Researchers suggest that promoting generic prescribing among specialists and
generalists may increase opportunities to reduce spending on prescription
drugs.4 One study involving six classes of chronic medications
(coenzyme A reductase inhibitors, CCBs, oral contraceptives, orally inhaled
corticosteroids, angiotensin receptor blockers, and ACE inhibitors) found that
in three-tier pharmacy benefit plans, prescribing generic or preferred
medications within a therapeutic class was associated with improvements in
adherence to therapy.6
Another analysis reviewed data from
a Medicare Beneficiary Survey of noninstitutionalized patients over age 65
with hypertension who used one or more multisource cardiovascular drugs.7
Seniors with low incomes or no prescription coverage were only somewhat more
likely to use generic cardiovascular drugs than more affluent and insured
seniors.7 The findings suggested that physicians and policy makers
may be missing opportunities to decrease costs for Medicare and its
economically disadvantaged beneficiaries.7
Generic-Only Pharmacy Benefits
While some believe generic-only drug benefits are a means of providing some
coverage, as opposed to no coverage, one group examined how switching from
brand name to generic-only drug coverage affected seniors' medication use and
financial burden.8 Study participants belonged to a Medicare
managed care plan and were changed from a capped brand name benefits plan one
year to a generic-only benefits plan the next.8 Rates of switching
medications (e.g., from brand name drugs to generic equivalents, to
nonequivalent generics, and to different brand name drugs) increased after
discontinuation of brand name coverage.8 Interestingly, changing
from brand name benefits to generic-only medication coverage caused many
participants to switch to less expensive medications and also decreased
medication use and increased financial burden.8 The researchers
suggested that insurers need to assist patients in adjusting to a
discontinuation of brand name coverage.8
In addition, generic-only plans may
present more of a burden to patients with morbidities requiring therapy where
generic choices are more limited.9 One study found that elderly
patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease who participated with a
generic-only pharmacy benefit plan were more likely to use several strategies
to reduce their out-of-pocket costs (e.g., discuss out-of-pocket costs with
their physician, purchase medications from another country, reduce spending on
food and clothing) compared with similar patients with single-tier or two-tier
copayment pharmacy benefits.9 Furthermore, patients reported taking
less than the prescribed amount of a regular medication and completely stopped
taking one or more of their regular medications.9
Educating the Patient
Assessing the patient's and/or caregiver's level of health literacy is
critical to the patient education process, thereby enabling the pharmacist to
tailor the written and verbal communications to the appropriate level of
comprehension. Patients should be encouraged to discuss their pharmacy benefit
plans with their primary care physician at the point of prescribing, consult
their physician and pharmacist about the appropriateness of brand or generic
medications for their particular conditions, and, when options are available,
obtain advice on which is the most appropriate employer pharmacy benefit plan
or Medicare Part D plan based on their particular medication utilization.
Teaching seniors to ask the right questions about generic medications is
crucial.
References
1. Chin MH, Wang LC, et al. Appropriateness of medication selection for older
persons in an urban academic emergency department. Acad Emerg Med.
1999;6:1232-1242.
2. Steinman MA, Sands LP, Covinsky KE. Self-restriction of medications due to
cost in seniors without prescription coverage. J Gen Intern Med.
2001;16:793-799.
3. Huskamp HA, Deverka PA, Epstein AM, et al. The effect of incentive-based
formularies on prescription-drug utilization and spending. N Engl J Med
. 2003;349:2224-2232.
4. Federman AD, Halm EA, Siu AL. Use of generic cardiovascular medications by
elderly Medicare beneficiaries receiving generalist or cardiologist care.
Med Care. 2007;45:109-115.
5. Rector TS, Finch MD, Danzon PM, et al. Effect of tiered prescription
copayments on the use of preferred brand medications. Med Care.
2003;41:398-406.
6. Shrank WH, Hoang T, Ettner SL, et al. The implications of choice:
prescribing generic or preferred pharmaceuticals improves medication adherence
for chronic conditions. Arch Intern Med. 2006;166:332-337.
7. Federman AD, Halm EA, Zhu C, et al. Association of income and prescription
drug coverage with generic medication use among older adults with
hypertension. Am J Manag Care. 2006;12:611-618.
8. Tseng CW, Brook RH, Keeler E, et al. Effect of generic-only drug benefits
on seniors' medication use and financial burden. Am J Manag Care.
2006;12:525-532.
9. Spence MM, Hui R, Chan J. Cost reduction strategies used by elderly
patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease to cope with a
generic-only pharmacy benefit. J Manag Care Pharm. 2006;12:377-382.
To comment on this article, contact
editor@uspharmacist.com.
|