US Pharm. 2006;31(11)(Diabetes suppl):7-12.
Until
the mid-1970s, patients with diabetes who sought to determine the percentage
of glucose in the blood were able to do so only through using sticks or
tablets to test urine (e.g., Clinistix, Clinitest, Tes-Tape, Diastix). The
advent and widespread acceptance of blood glucose monitors (meters) in the
mid-1970s revolutionized control for patients with diabetes.1 The
American Diabetes Association now recommends self-monitoring of blood glucose
(SMBG) to help ensure tight control of the condition.2 Since their
inception, blood glucose meters have undergone numerous changes, each designed
to make them more user-friendly and increase their utility.
The Rapidly Changing Nature of the Market
Blood glucose
monitors appear to be small, uncomplicated devices. However, they are
extremely intricate machines that use the latest technological advances to
provide an accurate measure of blood glucose levels. Manufacturers of these
products have historically been extremely responsive to changes in design. As
soon as one manufacturer develops an innovative and useful new feature for its
monitors, other companies must analyze the innovation to determine whether it
is worth emulating. Thus, manufacturers can gain a competitive advantage by
continually updating their product line to attract purchasers. As a result of
this rapidly changing market, blood glucose meters experience an obsolescence
virtually unprecedented among devices sold in pharmacies. A meter that is
state-of-the-art in 2007 may be hopelessly outdated by 2008.
Competition and Profit
A major factor
driving the rapid changes in the blood glucose monitor market is a result of
the enormous profits attendant upon their purchase and continued use. However,
the cost of the meters themselves is actually a minor point for the
manufacturers. In fact, some manufacturers virtually give the meters to
patients for free by offering partial or total rebates on their purchase. The
reason for this seeming generosity lies in the profitability of the blood
glucose strips that must be used with the meters. Each meter requires its own
strip. Indeed, this strip requirement is so specific that when a blood glucose
meter becomes obsolete, its test strips often become difficult or impossible
to locate, eventually forcing the patient to purchase a new meter.
The cost of blood glucose
testing strips is the real issue behind the dynamic nature of the blood
glucose testing market. Depending on the purchase location, a box of 50 blood
glucose test strips may sell for $30 to $40, while a box of 100 strips may
retail for $60 to $75.
The American Diabetes
Association estimates that there are 20.8 million children and adults with
diabetes--approximately 7% of the population.3 At least 5% to
10% of all people with diabetes have type 1 diabetes.4 Another
135,000 cases of gestational diabetes occur each year. The balance is a large
number of patients with type 2 diabetes. While the role of SMBG for patients
with stable type 2 diabetes that is treated only by diet is undefined, some
argue that it would be beneficial.5
The typical patient with type
1 diabetes may test three to four times a day or more (e.g., before meals, two
hours after meals, at bedtime, at 3 a.m., and any time the patient experiences
signs or symptoms).5 This translates to an annual strip cost of
$1,100 to $1,150. The typical patient with type 2 diabetes may test only once
or twice daily, for an annual strip cost of $270 to $600.6 Patients
with gestational diabetes are usually advised to test twice daily.5
Thus, a manufacturer that markets a blood glucose monitor that is better
accepted than others stands to gain hundreds of millions of dollars in income,
given that the annual SMBG market is estimated at several billion dollars.
5
Even though physicians and
national organizations have provided well-defined recommendations for SMBG
testing frequency, research has confirmed that there is a wide gap between the
recommendations and the actual practice of patients.7 This is
largely due to the expense of the strips, a concern that may be alleviated if
manufacturers would cooperate to produce monitors that all accept the same
low-cost generic strip. As the realities of competition will likely prevent
this utopian ideal from coming to fruition, pharmacists will continue to
confront questions surrounding strip purchases and the attendant expenses. At
one time, patients resorted to purchasing razor-like devices known as strip
splitters, which purportedly allowed them to split the strip in half
lengthwise, effectively halving the cost of strips. Monitor manufacturers
discouraged patients from this practice, asserting that the accuracy of the
devices could not be guaranteed under those circumstances.
Literature on Blood Glucose Meters
I
t is difficult for pharmacists to find articles about blood glucose meters
that are completely up-to-date. Although an author may obtain the most current
information available at the time of writing an article, new meters may appear
on the market during the typical lag time of several months between submission
of a manuscript and its publication. Thus, pharmacists should continually scan
the shelves to ascertain which models are most current. Manufacturer Web
sites, which are updated frequently, provide a good overview of the current
products. Furthermore, advertisements in pharmacy journals often highlight the
latest meters.
The Importance of Counseling
Blood glucose
monitors are complicated, as a brief look at their instruction manuals
demonstrates. For this reason, the patient with diabetes should be urged to
obtain training in meter use from a certified diabetes educator (CDE). As part
of a comprehensive diabetes-training program, the CDE should demonstrate the
meter and have the patient use the meter under his or her close supervision.
5 The National Certification Board for Diabetes Educators provides
details about the process of CDE credentialing at www.ncbde.org/about.html.
However, even a pharmacist who is not a CDE still fields many questions about
meters and strips.
Pharmacists can provide
general advice about monitor use. The patient should follow a standard set of
steps, beginning with washing the hands with soap and warm water and cleansing
the sample area with alcohol.5 After the sample area has dried, the
patient should use the lancet to puncture the skin at the site indicated. The
patient must next follow directions--required by the FDA for each meter and
strip set--for inserting the strip and using the meter. Patients should read
all of the instructions prior to first use and keep them for future reference.
Patients should bring their
monitor with them to all counseling sessions, whether the session is conducted
by a physician or a CDE. The pharmacist or counselor can watch and critique
the patient's use of the device. Further, the patient can also have a blood
sample analyzed by both a laboratory and his or her own meter. If the
laboratory and the meter agree, the meter and patient's technique can be
trusted. If they do not, the pharmacist or CDE should examine the patient's
technique and/or consult the meter's manufacturer.
Recent Innovations
Calibration
Issues: Most glucose
meters require preuse calibration.7,8 This may consist of entering
a calibration code or using a check strip. Apparently, many patients fail to
perform this critical step correctly. Based on research demonstrating that 16%
of patients carrying out SMBG use incorrectly coded meters, a group of
researchers assessed the results of several intentionally miscoded meters.
8 They used blood samples from 50 subjects in two different meters. Each
meter was miscoded using a number different from that recommended for the
strip utilized. Incorrect coding produced results that differed from those of
properly coded meters by as much as 30%. The investigators also tested a blood
glucose monitor with an autocoding feature. Although the investigators
attempted to use different strips to challenge this system, it did not display
inaccuracies.
The first meter with the
autocoding feature was the recently introduced Ascensia Contour, now joined by
the Ascensia Breeze.9 Both use special test strips that eliminate
the need for coding, as calibration occurs with each strip insertion.7
Of course, the advantage in using their unique strips is also a significant
disadvantage for some users, as the strips are no less expensive than most
other strips. The meters also carry the standard features included in the
current generation of meters.
Meters can usually read blood
glucose values ranging from 0 to 600 mg/dL. However, the FDA urges patients to
interpret very high or low values with extreme caution.5 Patients
might consider checking the calibration of the meter and confirming these
values with an additional reading.
Sample Size Required:
One of the disincentives to SMBG is the need to obtain blood samples. Older
blood glucose meters (e.g., Accu-Chek Advantage) required 4 to 10 microliters
of blood.10 Some even included instructions intended to maximize
the sample volume, such as:
• Massage the
hand from the wrist down to the fingertips several times to increase the
volume of blood.
• Apply greater
pressure to the finger with the bloodletting device to deepen the puncture
wound.
• Massage the
punctured digit to increase the amount of blood dripping onto the strip.
Unfortunately, users reported
that the discomfort associated with blood withdrawal and the associated
manipulations was directly proportional to the size of sample required by the
meters. To help prevent this source of discomfort-associated noncompliance,
manufacturers gradually decreased the sample size required by the meters.
Sample sizes decreased to 1 microliter, then to 0.6 microliter, and now to 0.3
microliter. Most newly introduced meters require only 0.3 microliter.
Eventually, manufacturers will undoubtedly reduce the required sample size
further, spawning yet another generation of small-sample meters.
Some meters (e.g., Glucometer
Dex 2) pull the blood sample into the meter through a capillary action,
preventing the patient from having to insert the strip into the meter.
Ability to Sample from
Other Areas: The
finger has a rich blood supply that makes it a mandatory testing site for
large-sample testing meters. Unfortunately, the fingers also have the nerves
required for sensitivity of touch. Thus, repeated blood withdrawal produces
pain or discomfort that endures throughout the day.
The introduction of meters
that could process smaller sample sizes opened the possibility of sampling at
sites other than the fingers. Using alternate sites reduces pain because the
needle stick does not have to penetrate as deeply and there are fewer nerve
endings at sites other than the fingers. For example, the older Accu-Chek
Advantage requires a finger stick, but the newer Accu-Chek Aviva permits
testing from the palm, forearm, upper arm, calf, or thigh.
The FDA has cautioned against
using nonfingertip sites for SMBG.5 The agency has asserted that
blood in the fingertips exhibits changes in blood glucose more rapidly than
does blood in other sites. This could be crucial, as the alternate sites may
not reflect the current level of blood glucose when it is undergoing a rapid
change (e.g., following a meal, insulin administration, or exercise). The
agency stated, "FDA believes that further research is needed to better
understand these differences in test values and their possible impact on the
health of people with diabetes."5 The agency requested that
all manufacturers demonstrate that their device is not affected by differences
between alternative site and fingertip blood samples during rapidly changing
blood glucose situations or alert patients to the possibility of obtaining
incorrect values at those times. The alert would also warn patients not to use
alternative test sites if they think they are hypoglycemic, if they are not
aware of symptoms when they experience hypoglycemia, or if alternate site
results do not agree with their own perception of their blood glucose levels.
Testing Speed:
The time required to obtain a result from the monitor could be critical in the
case of a patient with severe hypoglycemia. Current meters produce results in
as little as five to 30 seconds.
Cleaning:
Some meters, especially the older versions, required regular cleaning with
soap and water to maintain accuracy.5 Newer meters function without
external cleaning, making them more convenient.
Quality Controls:
Test solutions are often supplied with meters and are also available from
pharmacies. These quality control checks help ensure the accuracy of meters,
which may be dropped, immersed in water, or exposed to heat or extreme
humidity. Patients substitute the test solutions for blood samples, following
the same steps to produce a blood glucose measurement. They compare the
results provided by the meter with the actual value of the control solution,
ideally producing the measurement. If there is a discrepancy, the monitor is
not working properly. Manufacturers also may include a cartridge or special
control test strip that generates a signal if the meter is performing properly.
Other Features:
Most blood glucose monitors store previous readings, including the time and
date of the reading. The number of previous readings varies with the specific
meter, from about 250 to as many as 3,000 (OneTouch UltraSmart). Most meters
enable users to download readings directly to their home computer, although
this feature sometimes requires special cables or software that can be
downloaded from the meter manufacturer's Web site. The software may allow
patients to obtain 14- and 30-day averages, as well as averages of all
readings taken at any specific time (e.g., 6 a.m. or noon).
Monitors are powered by
batteries, which are ideally readily available in any mass marketer and easy
to replace. Although many meters fulfill this need, requiring only two common
alkaline batteries of AA or AAA size, others require more expensive and
difficult-to-locate lithium watch batteries or AAAA batteries. Patients should
purchase two sets of batteries at a time, so a backup set will always be
available. Meters usually yield 700 to 1,000 tests per battery set.
Some patients are directed to
test ketones. For many years, patients had to use at-home urine ketone test
strips. However, some blood glucose meters, such as the Precision Xtra, can
also measure ketone levels. Each package of blood glucose strips also includes
a few ketone test strips, along with strips to calibrate the meter for glucose
and ketones.
The CheckMate Plus monitor has
a useful feature: a built-in lancet. The patient applies 4.5 pounds of
pressure to cock a lancet, places the target finger over a built-in finger
bowl, and triggers the lancet. The drop of blood is applied to a wick on the
test strip, and the results are read in 60 seconds.
Conclusion
Blood glucose
monitors are complicated devices that are redesigned frequently. Patients
benefit from an informed pharmacist who can help them understand the various
features of the different meters prior to purchase of a specific model.
REFERENCES
1. Pray WS. Noncompliance with self-monitoring of blood glucose: the problem and possible solutions. The CE Solution. Available at: www.thecesolution.com/ce/index.asp. Accessed October 4, 2006.
2. Kimberly MM , Vesper HW, Caudill SP, et al. Variability among five over-the-counter blood glucose monitors. Clin Chim Acta. 2006;364:292-297.
3. American Diabetes Association. Total prevalence of diabetes and pre-diabetes. Available at: www.diabetes.org/diabetes-statistics/prevalence.jsp. Accessed October 4, 2006.
4. American Diabetes Association. All about diabetes. Available at: www.diabetes.org/aboutdiabetes.jsp. Accessed October 4, 2006.
5. FDA. Glucose meters & diabetes management. Available at: www.fda.gov/diabetes/glucose.html. Accessed October 4, 2006.
6. Sachon C, Jacqueminet S, Hartemann-Heurtier A, Grimaldi A. Should diabetic patients be asked to test their blood glucose 90 to 120 minutes after the beginning of their meals? Diabetes Metab. 2006;32:377-381.
7. Kilo C Sr, Dickey WT Jr, Joynes JO, et al. Evaluation of a new blood glucose monitoring system with auto-calibration for home and hospital bedside use. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2006;74:66-74.
8. Baum JM, Monhaut NM, Parker DR, Price CP. Improving the quality of self-monitoring blood glucose measurement: a study in reducing calibration errors. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2006;8:347-357.
9. Bayer HealthCare. Accuracy made easy. Available
at: www.bayercarediabetes.com/prodserv/products/contour/index.asp. Accessed
October 4,
2006.
10. Walgreen Co. Blood glucose meter comparison
chart. Available at: www.walgreens.com/library/centers/diabetes/bgmcc.jsp.
Accessed October 4, 2006.
To comment on this article, contact
editor@uspharmacist.com.